Semiotics and
Positive Deviance
Every day
you are a semiotician. You read the signs and symbols of your culture and
society. The stop signs, the hand signals and body language people share with
you or didn’t mean to communicate with you. Semiotics is an important aspect of
everyday life, though most people do not realize it. According to
Merriam-Webster, Semiotics is “a general philosophical theory of signs and
symbols that deals especially with their function in both artificially constructed
and natural languages and comprises syntactics, semantics, and pragmatics.”[1]
It involves every aspect of human communication. At the best of times
communications are difficult, Hall writes, “One problem of semiotics is that the message that arrives at
the destination is not always the same one that has been sent.”[2] Semiotics is critical in the
understanding of Positive Deviance. The reading and interpreting of practices
and strategies or signs as Daniel Chandler would insist may help communicate
deviant activities. Concerning the ability to interpret deviant semiotics on an
individual level Chandler refers to semioticians, Lakoff and Johnson’s
conclusions. He asserts,
They argue that (as with metaphor)
metonymic substitution may influence our thoughts, attitudes and actions by
focusing on certain aspects of a concept and suppressing other aspects which are
inconsistent with the metonym . . . . When we think of Picasso, we are
not just thinking of a work art alone, in and of itself. We think of it in terms
of its relation to the artist, this is, his conception of art, his technique,
his role in art history, etc." I wonder if their "etc." would
include his ear! Just by mentioning, Picasso, many aspects of his art
and his personal story come to mind, but it may not be the same thought.[3]
Semiotics in relationship to the
Positive Deviance Approach is similar to beauty in the eye of the beholder.
What is beautiful to one person is not necessarily beautiful to another, so
semiotics is the art of interpretation of signs and symbols. Identifying
Positive Deviance practitioners requires the ability to observe even the
slightest variances in practices and strategies. The importance of semiotics in
the Positive Deviance Approach is the ability to identify the practitioners of
positive deviance through the nuances amid their practices. The ability to
discern the difference between the conventional wisdom of a group and the
positive deviance practices and strategies is crucial to determining viable
solutions amid the group.
The signs of positive deviant
practices and strategies in a cultural setting may not always be obvious. Dr.
William Seidman and Michael McCauley assert, “Most people think of a deviant as
someone who does bad things . . . there are also positive deviants . . . positive deviants transcend the
conventional wisdoms, discovering new and innovative ways to function without
creating conflict.”[4] The semiotics of the Positive Deviance
Approach is revealed by extraordinary results. Dr. Sternin views positive deviants
as people who are willing to work outside of conventional wisdom and use
unconventional means to obtain the culturally accepted goals. Concerning Dr.
Sternin’s observations about the semiotics of Positive Deviance, he writes,
“Half out of desperation, half in inspiration . . . there are individuals whose
exceptional behavior or practices enable them to get better results than their
neighbors with the same exact resources.”[5]
The semiotics of the Positive
Deviance Approach appears as a willingness not to be limited by the
conventional wisdom of a context or cultural group. This willingness usually is
not seen as creating conflict in a cultural setting though it might be viewed
with skepticism or with cultural ambivalence. The practitioner’s approach is self-initiative
and innovation as practices and strategies that lead to a change in behavior.
The behavioral changes result in the accepted goal of the culture. Are you
willing to make a difference? Could we be the possible answer to an intractable
issue?
[1]
Semiotics. (2009). In Merriam-Webster
Online Dictionary. Retrieved December 14, 2009, from
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Semiotics.
[2] Sean
Hall, This Means This, This Means That: A User’s Guide to Semiotics
(London: L. King Pub., 2007). 32.
[3] Metonymic substitution is a
figure of speech consisting of the use of the name of one thing for that of
another of which it is an attribute or with which it is associated (as “crown” in “lands
belonging to the crown”) Merriam-Webster; Daniel
Chandler, Semiotics: The Basics, 2nd ed. (London ;;New York: Routledge,
2007).
[4]
William Seidman and Michael McCauley, “Positive Deviants Rule,” http://www.cerebyte.biz/articles/PositiveDeviantsRule.pdf
(accessed December 15, 2009)
[5]
Dorsey, 285.
No comments:
Post a Comment